What is your preferred fuel?

Discussion in 'Stove Forum' started by IvanN, Sep 5, 2017.

?

What is your fuel of first choice?

  1. Kerosene

    35 vote(s)
    51.5%
  2. White Gas

    20 vote(s)
    29.4%
  3. Alcohol

    4 vote(s)
    5.9%
  4. canister gas

    1 vote(s)
    1.5%
  5. Other?

    8 vote(s)
    11.8%
  1. Doc Mark

    Doc Mark SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    19,660
    Location:
    So. California Mountains
    Greetings, All,

    Too hard to answer, as I very much enjoy Coleman Fuel (trust it, grew up with it), Kerosene (THE fuel of choice for most brassie discus stoves), and Methylated Spirits (can't live without a few Trangia stoves, and this is the only "green" fuel amongst the bunch!). But, if you limit your fuel choice to just one fuel, it would have to be kerosene....no, wait... Coleman Fuel...... er.... just a minute..... Meths..... NO Wait..... when do you have to know??!! Take care, and God Bless!

    Every Good Wish,
    Doc
     
  2. pau-i-amor

    pau-i-amor Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    747
    Location:
    17190 Salt, Catalunya
    Dom Perignon...

    (but it's a little bit expensive ;))
     
  3. Marc

    Marc Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2015
    Messages:
    6,905
    Location:
    Oregon, USA
    My favorite fuel (and what I voted for) is kerosene. Best mix of pure BTUs, reliability, use in any temperature or weather condition, and safety. And in an emergency, my truck will run on it. My least-used fuel due to lack of availability and my most commonly used stove doesn't like burning it much.

    What I actually USE the most..................is pump/car gasoline. A Coleman suitcase lives in the sunroom, for use out on the patio all summer. Much nicer to cook outside when it's warm. Always have a can of stabilized car gas handy for other equipment so always have fuel for it. Stove gets drained and stored on white gas because car gas is spectacularly unsuited to storage.

    Hiking, my most-used fuel is butane. Hard to deny the ease and speed with which it can be deployed. Can stop hiking and have water heating in less than a minute.
     
  4. Trojandog

    Trojandog United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,295
    Location:
    East Sussex
    Domestic and car camping - kero, (not at all influenced by the fact that I have a 1300 litre tank of the stuff :lol: )

    Hiking - white gas/Coleman fuel/panel wipe.

    Overseas - alcohol in a Trangia (easy to source and no airline hassle).
     
  5. Retro Camper

    Retro Camper Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    307
    Meths ticks all the boxes for me; it's green, cleaner to handle and UK meths smells great when alight! Kero is next, then butane/propane. White gas trails in last.
     
  6. CJ1

    CJ1 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2014
    Messages:
    32
    Kerosene is my choice for stove and lantern. I converted a few years ago, mostly because of this site! I was a Coleman person before and swore by white gas, now I just swear at it.

    I love the heat from kerosene, you can really feel the difference. I only use alcohol to pre-heat for the kerosene. That being said, when I'm using my 123R or 8R I have to use white gas, but the 111C runs kerosene exclusively.
     
  7. Pitsligo

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    485
    Location:
    Olympia, WA, USA
    It depends.

    On the boat, cruising solo: Kero/para. It's the same fuel as the running lights and riding light, so I only have to carry large stocks of the one fuel, and it's safer than white gas and hotter than alk. And I love my brassies.

    On the boat with my now-ex: Alk/meths. Safe, acceptibly hot, and less smell to make herself uncomfortable. Not so much of a priority now, though... On its own merits a serious contender for its "green" cred, too. (And I love my brassies.)

    Hiking and camping: White gas/naptha. Hot, easy operation, and no separate primer needed. Unlike on the boat, if anything goes *seriously* amiss I've got plenty of room to get clear, so safety isn't a problem. I can take my Svea 123, Op111, or Whisperlite and be perfectly content.

    Since using the stoves on the boat (and I'm now sailing solo) is 90% of my stove use these days, kero gets my vote, but ask me in a year and the answer might be different. It's not like I'll ever get rid of my meths or naptha stoves because I don't like their fuel.

    Alex
     
  8. Punisher

    Offline
    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2015
    Messages:
    31
    White gas followed closely by kerosene.
     
  9. Vacek

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2015
    Messages:
    79
    I am mixed on this. Being USA I grew up with Coleman. In 1982 I spent the summer camping my way to Alaska and back. I converted my Coleman suitcase to propane (had a 5lb refillable tank) for convenience when in the car. When flying into the bush and/or backpacking I had the original Peak 1.

    I now travel pretty much every week so my go to is the old French surplus aluminum stove that I use alcohol gel, the kind you wash your hands with. Why.... because you can check that in with your luggage and even a small amount in carry-on.

    In every car I have a one burner Coleman propane. No worries about spillage. Not romantic but practical.

    And by they way, I grew up in the Texas Panhandle where there isn't much water but a lot of crude oil and natural gas. It's funny if a significant amount of income comes from fossil fuel one doesn't worry much about using it for cooking. Besides, to make alcohol you have to grow a crop which is very inefficient regarding water use. You use fossil fuel to plant, harvest and control the weeds then use more fossil fuel to distill the alcohol. So whomever thinks that alcohol is green has been deluding themselves or drinking too much of said substance.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2017
  10. Ed Winskill

    Ed Winskill United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    15,009
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washinghton, USA
    Whatever the larger environmental issues are with fossil fuels, I find it impossible to understand how they can relate to camp stove fuel, for the reasons Vacek touches upon.
     
  11. snwcmpr

    snwcmpr SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    22,082
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Possibly, but not necessarily. Wood was the common source of heat for moonshiners. One is always warned to "Watch for the smoke!" when hiking in the mountains here. ")
     
  12. z1ulike

    z1ulike United States SotM Winner SotY Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2010
    Messages:
    4,598
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Many modern distilleries use electricity to heat their stills. The electricity often comes from renewable hydroelectric, wind, solar, or geothermal sources.

    Ben
     
  13. pulsar

    pulsar Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    146
    A fair bit of electricity is made from trash too...
     
  14. Gomer Snerd

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    plutonium
     
  15. pulsar

    pulsar Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
    Messages:
    146
  16. geeves

    geeves New Zealand Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    6,947
    Location:
    Christchurch NZ
    comes from the ground its a fossil fuel. Actually thats not fully correct is it. Plutonium is manufactured from urainium which is the fossil fuel. There is only so much to go round and with Kim wasting it making large underground caverns it will run out one day
     
  17. Ed Winskill

    Ed Winskill United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    15,009
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washinghton, USA
    I don't think uranium is a fossil fuel.....but it's old, I'll give you that.
     
  18. Odd

    Offline
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2013
    Messages:
    737
    Location:
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Actually uranium is sort of a renewable energy source
    - when the U235 are being used in an ordinary reactor it "looses" neutrons creating plutonium (out of the non-fissile U238) which later runs a significant part of the reaction in the later part of a fuel cycle.
    In the spent fuel there are still an amount of fissile material left. If that fuel is reprocessed, as opposed to directly sent to a final repository facility, it can be separated into mainly three fractions: fissile plutonium, non-fissile uranium and "waste". If that Pu, and also U238, are combined into new fuel rods - you get what's called "MOX fuel" [Mixed OXide] which can then be sent back into the ordinary reactor for another cycle - ad infinitum.
    It's the "waste" that needs to be taken care of - the rest is a renewable energy source for lots of fuel cycles long into the future. Using the U238 in artillery shells + burning the Pu off in spectacular fireworks is a true waste of our future.
    In several ways...
    /Odd
    "Water boiler" in both very large and minute scale - since several decades...
     
  19. ArchMc

    ArchMc SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,704
    Location:
    Mojave Desert, California
    I hate to rain on your parade, but according to these folks, most of the methanol produced in the USA is made from natural gas. I'm pretty sure that's also true in most other industrialized countries.

    As an undergrad over 40 years ago, we were told that most alcohol produced for industrial purposes (that would include fuels) is petrochemical in origin.

    It's possible to produce methanol, ethanol, and other alcohols from fermentation and distillation, but apparently most fuel alcohol is not produced that way.

    ....Arch
     
  20. snwcmpr

    snwcmpr SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    22,082
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Umbrella in hand.