Curious discovery on a Primus No.3 burner

Discussion in 'Stove Forum' started by igh371, Jan 29, 2020.

  1. Twoberth

    Twoberth United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2017
    Messages:
    1,828
    Location:
    England
    Ian, have you tried on of these? They are easy to make from a piece of hex bar.

    DSC09375.JPG DSC09376.JPG DSC09377.JPG DSC09378.JPG

    One end of the bar is bent at about 45 degrees, the other is straight so you can always get a good fit into one of the six holes.

    DSC09381.JPG DSC09382.JPG DSC09383.JPG
     
  2. igh371

    igh371 SotM Winner Subscriber

    Online
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,846
    Location:
    Durham
    :shock:
    Looks like one of the apprentice tests the old boys from Vickers Scotswood works used to talk about: take a square of 1/2" plate and a 6" long piece of round bar: then, using hand tools only, put a hexagon shaped hole through the plate and convert the round bar to a hex that will pass through the plate as a sliding fit in all orientations :shock:
     
  3. nmp

    nmp SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,130
    Location:
    UK
    image.jpg Resurrecting this older thread.
    I have just dismantled an original No3 and found to my surprise the same restrictor plate as mentioned in previous posts but with gauze as well, completely clogged with what I suspected was some kind of asbestos so it was removed and under a running tap just in case! Then put in the ultra sonic cleaner which sorted gauaze and plate beautifully

    This was on a 1914 stove so either it was a replacement burner or Primus had been fitting restrictor plates as early as that?

    This one is with the plate top recessed to fit nearer the jet than the riser tube. F4AEF267-83F1-4993-B47B-9FDFB09DBF02.jpeg 61A267A5-2950-45CF-9CA0-EEB95CC707FD.jpeg A0DE2922-FE48-45CE-9EB4-B5CDDE359575.jpeg 320E23A9-F7EA-4348-AA71-FE04C741CA81.jpeg
     
  4. Tony Press

    Tony Press Ukraine Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    10,765
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
    @nmp

    Thanks for reminding me if this thread. I had forgotten about it.

    There was no obvious restrictor in the two burners of my Primus No. 3, but when it gets a bit more light here in Tassie, I’ll check to see if there’s any evidence of the burners having had restrictors or “inside” threading.

    Cheers

    Tony
     
  5. Tony Press

    Tony Press Ukraine Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    10,765
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
    I’ve checked my Primus No. 3 burners.

    The wrecked one that came with the stove is threaded inside the burner to accommodate a threaded restrictor.

    B8488652-4EB2-462B-8F0E-6989EAA6D83C.jpeg


    The spare burner that I fitted to the stove, and which seems to burn well, is not threaded inside the burner, and has a blob of casting brass or brazing inside the burner tube.

    BDF2A65C-1221-4B80-B3B1-A45836049958.jpeg

    E634E906-FD4D-46F1-82A2-5484C1A2BDDE.jpeg


    Here is the burner running without a restrictor.

    03EE80EC-78FF-4E3B-BB49-E72D971C7DCB.jpeg


    Cheers

    Tony
     
  6. nmp

    nmp SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,130
    Location:
    UK
    I got my No 3 running tonight had some good green flames to start that settled to a blue flame with orange tips the pulsing was evident until I turned it down fairly low. Very noisy! I was running it with the restrictor and mesh in.
     
  7. james charles bennett United Kingdom

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2025
    Messages:
    42
    Location:
    Leicester
    @MrAlexxx
    Its called a restrictor my primus no 3 has one
     
  8. james charles bennett United Kingdom

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2025
    Messages:
    42
    Location:
    Leicester
    @lgh371
    Hi despite reports from others on here (and respect to them) i have found if you run the primus no3 burner without a restrictor you run the risk of a fire due to the amount of pressure through the burner pipes
     
  9. igh371

    igh371 SotM Winner Subscriber

    Online
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    2,846
    Location:
    Durham
    makes sense, Primus would not have gone to all the cost and effort of developing anf fitting those restrictors without good reason. And there would have been users then who would not have taken the care members here do now to consider and regulate tank pressures!
     
  10. Tony Press

    Tony Press Ukraine Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    10,765
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia