Roarer or silent ?

Diskussion i 'Stove Forum' startad av Radius1, 22 augusti 2008.

  1. Radius1

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    16 augusti 2008
    Inlägg:
    26
    Last edited by a moderator: 1 juli 2015
  2. David Shouksmith

    David Shouksmith Subscriber

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    28 juli 2004
    Inlägg:
    7.167
    I've no specific knowledge of that particular make but, in general terms, I'd say it depends to a large extent where you intend to use the stove...

    If it's to be mainly outdoors, I'd go for a roarer because they're more wind-resistant and the noise is less of an issue (unless it's 05:30 of course!) For inside use, I'd go for a silent. Hope that helps...
     
  3. dsk

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    17 augusti 2004
    Inlägg:
    600
    Från:
    Oslo, Norway
    I would rather develop my own windscrean.
    Check out some info about the nansen cooker.

    dsk
     
  4. sefaudi

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    19 oktober 2004
    Inlägg:
    752
    Från:
    Turkey
    Hey Radis1,

    I am with David. I depends on where and what time you are planning to use that stove.

    Just for our knowledge, can you tell us, if there is any price difference among those version? Also since those are sold at fix price (commercial off the shelf) may be you can advise prices...

    But if I am not mistaken (if so please anyone correct me) with roarer burners we get more power output against silents.
     
  5. Radius1

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    16 augusti 2008
    Inlägg:
    26
    Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
    Ok, let me specify:
    Usage: Outside summer and winter.

    There are no price difference between the two Prabhat versions. (Approx 50£ UK).
    The reason I am interesting in the Prabhat is that they are collapsible, classic design, and new (no collector items).

    So, what I am questioning is actually the pros and cons for the roarer versus the silent (in general).

    I have three fully operational kerosene stoves, all with a roarers, and am impressed how easy they are to light up, and how powerful they are:
    Primus no.1 s:or (1931), and a Radius no.1 s:or (1928 or 1938), none of these are collapsible in addition to be collector items.
    My hiking stove is a Radius no. 43, I am very happy with this (photo attached). My "problem" is that I like the classic stove design the best ;)
    In addition, with a new stove in hand I can refurbish my Radius 43 to show room condition ;)

    1219420439-1219411618-b_radius.jpg

    BTW, here is pictures of my Radius no.1 s:or
    https://classiccampstoves.com/threads/8665
     

    Bifogade filer:

    Last edited by a moderator: 2 juli 2015
  6. David Shouksmith

    David Shouksmith Subscriber

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    28 juli 2004
    Inlägg:
    7.167
    Roarer every time for me!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: 2 juli 2015
  7. Bom Bom Bom Bom

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    25 juni 2008
    Inlägg:
    2.945
    Hi Radius1, Looking at the Prabhats on the Stuga-Cabana site it looks as if they come with a reserve cap. However, the pictures aren't that clear (and I don't speak German) so you might want to satisfy yourself they are designed for being collapsible for travelling whilst containing fuel, rather then merely being collapsable to make them smaller for storage. You'll probably be OK, but best to make sure. Or maybe someone who owns one could chip in.

    Edit:
    OK, just looked at the pictures in the links contained in your original post - looks like you're OK. However, have a look at the site I mentioned above - a lot cheaper than £50!
     
  8. bajabum

    bajabum R.I.P.

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    23 december 2005
    Inlägg:
    7.368
    Last edited by a moderator: 1 juli 2015
  9. Radius1

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    16 augusti 2008
    Inlägg:
    26
    Thank you for leading me to Stuga Cabana :)
    I have now ordered some spare parts like pump leather, and the foldable wind screen.
     
  10. Jan-Willem

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    7 maj 2006
    Inlägg:
    152
    Why choose? You can get just the burner as a spare part, then you can swap them whenever you like.
    I personally like silents, but I have to agree they don't like wind, and in cold/wind they are much more difficult to get started.
    Roarers will work, wind or rain....
     
  11. DonTom

    DonTom Subscriber

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    22 januari 2006
    Inlägg:
    238
    Från:
    New Zealand
    Hi Radius1,

    Welcome to the forum.
    If you are using a Trangia set-up including windscreen, I would suggest going for the silent burner. The windscreen is very effective, so you will gain little advantage frm the roarer.
    I feel that you can get finer adjustment fro a silent burner on kero, there is a greater mass of metal in the head to aid vapourisation, so you can simmer at a lower level.
    Also, conversation is easier around a silent burner!
    Plus, you already have roarer burners, time to spread your wings! And as Spudz points out, you can always swap to a roarer if it doesn't work out......
    Cheers, Tom
     
  12. reubenhowes

    Offline
    Blev medlem:
    9 mars 2005
    Inlägg:
    17
    as others have said depends on usage - if you will be using it for a cuppa mainly - then the roarer - if for frying eggs bacon or anything that needs a bit of finesse with the heat I find the silent more tolerant (and better heat spread) of being persuaded to go easy on what you are cooking (even if no control valve - by just reducing the pressure a bit) so depends - or as suggested before - buy both burners !!