Optimus No:199

Discussion in 'Optimus No:199' started by Motoshi Makino, Aug 30, 2008.

  1. Motoshi Makino

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    276
    Optimus No:199 2 type
    1220086698-DSC04969s.jpg 1220086715-DSC04972s.jpg 1220086735-DSC04973s.jpg 1220086770-DSC04965bs.jpg
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 27, 2015
  2. Maxbug

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10
    please can tell me why different on the top of burner?
     
  3. theyellowdog

    Offline
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,104
    This pot stand is good and stable. The other x type was probably introduced because it is common to other stoves, Optimus loke and Optimus eagle. The x type probably packs ways easier too. That's my guess anyway. This stoves pot supports are probably better.
     
  4. Maxbug

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10
    dear Sir but see the pump the straight one seems should be the introduced one? may I right?
     
  5. pysen78

    pysen78 Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    688
    Re: the pot supports. I'm thinking it's a safety design change. (aswell as making manufacturing a bit cheaper)

    The early bigger supports encourages the user to use bigger pots. Big pots together with that burner could mean overheating.

    Can't put large pots on the X-type.
     
  6. theyellowdog

    Offline
    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,104
    That makes sense.

    Mine has the wire ones, there are times I wished it was the x type as the pot looks to sit closer to the burner.
     
  7. Maxbug

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    10
    so you mean the X-type is early product?
    so the X-type is around 1980~19??
    the charmign stand is around 19??~19?? (later 1985~1990 ??)