@gieorgijewski That merchant's cartouche from Krakow is a real beauty, and pre-1911 by the look of the stove base marking. Do you know which model Primus it was attached to? Ian.
@gieorgijewski Wow, that is some find - a very early Primus No.8 traveller with the M.Bade, St.Petersburg, dealer's cartouche. Be very interesting to see what the base stamp on that is! All Bade-sold stoves and blowlamps so far have been significantly pre-1911, and this looks to be in the same vein with the tank top 'PATENT' legend which had gone by 1911. A little bit of manipulation of the image shows the model marking a little more clearly: Just my kind of stove
@gieorgijewski - a little more: pre-1911 the No.8 Traveller appears in both the 1903 and 1905 catalogues, but only the 1903 presentation shows the winged burner riser that you have on this one! Fabulous. Ian.
i dont know This burner construction... Is "outer cup" - "twoparts"? how looks - missing parts? is "inner cup" integrated with main part of burner?
i get it... here https://classiccampstoves.com/threads/svea-no-115-ex-mystery-max-sievert-stove.34110/#post-349431
@gieorgijewski More like this which is the Primus components to that type of burner. But, the design looks sort of wrong to me... Like it has been repaired...
@gieorgijewski The inner cap can often get stuck in this type of burner. If it is upside down (as observed by @abman47) it might be difficult to dislodge. Tony
i cant answer - becouse i do not get it... but imo - height of inner c. looks to low if inner is upside down - 1 row in outer is "open" - if inner have proper orientations - 2 rows will be opened ---------- and margins of outer c. is not small ...
the Bad the Ugly Primus 210 1,5 l cold water, time to boiling the Good - 12 min the Bad - 17 min - copper the Ugly - 15 min
