Coleman Camp Stove Dating Chart?

Discussion in 'Stove Forum' started by Matty, Feb 5, 2019.

  1. shagratork

    shagratork United Kingdom Moderator, R.I.P. Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    9,633
    Location:
    Durham, N.E. England
    This thread had a bit of a rocky start, but some excellent information has emerged.
    The brains of CCS members contain all sorts of gems that should see the light of day.
     
  2. Matty

    Offline
    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    318
    Herc, actually I am the one that has done his research.

    I gave up on this topic back in February. I just couldn't see the point in arguing anymore. I saw your reply just now because of some research I was doing brought up links to this topic.

    I can't see the point in all the self righteous protectors of all things Coleman as Ken apparently seems to be. Standing on a soap box protecting incorrect information... going on and on and on... I just don't get it.
     
  3. snwcmpr

    snwcmpr SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    22,059
    Location:
    North Carolina
  4. Doc Mark

    Doc Mark SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    19,658
    Location:
    So. California Mountains
    Greetings, All,

    I, too, dropped off of this thread, back when it was NEW, because it seemed to be a never-ending argument. I know that there are those folks to whom this sort of thing is good sport. I am NOT one of them. I'm sorry to see that the argument continues.....

    Doc
     
  5. HercL4D2

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2014
    Messages:
    529
    @Matty

    Matty I left this conversation 6 months ago also so why are you still ragging on about it?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 15, 2019
  6. snwcmpr

    snwcmpr SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    22,059
    Location:
    North Carolina
  7. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,761
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    Recent above comments (if we can call it that?) are odd, imo, and beside the point.

    To *all those interested in advancing a worthy topic...

    *all,
    Matty, If we return to OP: this topic, to your credit IS one that can go a long way to advance members understanding of US / CA (Canadian) models. Tony, does his research, has remained engaged and he might possibly want to add Canada / Australia notes? It seems many Coleman CA stoves & lamps were sold there.
    Contrary to above comments Herc has added content :thumbup::thumbup: resulting from research he has done and <-- that is and should be appreciated. Fopr all involved the topic is a work in progress and (I credit Ross) we can lighten up a bit here.
    No one of us has it right all the time, **collaborative research discussions can advance topics much faster than any one person's research. ** 1 of the best things about CCS imo, of course I
    am a flawed classic stove nerd, currently "the history" excites me as much as firing up stoves :oops:.

    Matty again, and PLEASE take my comments in entirety in "best possible way" that is my intent.
    You have shown impressive research ability and shared results.
    Your OP asks for existing list,
    but none exists.
    I suggest we create a US / CA (Canada) Coleman improved list… so ok, you and I have a disconnect there.
    You "gave up" ? in February... something I could learn from, seriously.
    Aside: I can't seem to give up on the soo many stove mysteries that haunt me, once hooked.
    You gave up in Feb., in March I posted on topic details and tagged you, then.

    In my March post i mention, in full agreement with you and with all due respect to --> " "The book"... [static content, when published] … confirmed details re Earliest Canadian Stove models were limited. …
    Due to lack of CA (Canadian) details "The book" suggests refer to US MODELS 1, 2 & 9 details. …
    I caution only that some CANADIAN MODELS are known (no mention in book) and we'll learn/confirm more in future. … Toronto product details continue to emerge, on CCS for example. CCS collaborative content is dynamic (vs static) and growing. "

    ---------------------

    "The book" includes 1900 - 1983... There may have been good reason and myself, I like that bracket as well or maybe 1900 - 1993? (I can skip newer models)…
    This is classic stove site, would members join me limiting interest to:
    US / CA Coleman liquid pressure stoves

    In meanwhile I note an ICCC online list has been updated a lot (vs years ago when I was checking)
    it is here:
    By Model - International Coleman Collectors Club

    but with said list, there is not a focus on classic liquid pressure stoves and it is "US only"

    sorry I went long but, purpose today, BUMP the topic , to Matty's credit, this topic, for stovies, needs some progress to be made (imo).
    Matty's interest that initiated this includes early Canadian suitcases,
    not in the book are:
    CA model 2 & 9
    CA model 2A
    CA model 9A
    CA model 11A / "Ranger"

    ^^^^ that and the linked ICCC list and scouterjan's CCF post I refer to above is, in support of my above comment:
    "imo a list could be developed fairly quickly [give credit were appropriate] with maybe 75-90% of known models included (quickly, much better than the existing list). The remainder could be added 1 piece at a time over subsequent years."

    thx omc
    tags @Matty @Tony Press @HercL4D2
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2019
  8. Tony Press

    Tony Press Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    10,858
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
     
  9. Barrett New Zealand

    Offline
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2018
    Messages:
    397
    Location:
    Northern New Zealand
    I for one would find a list very interesting and surely supplementary/complimentary to the list compiled by scouterjan and members of CCF.
    There may be some pieces of information held within CCS membership that hasn't made it to the CCF list?
     
  10. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,761
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    JUMP START to old thread credit and thanks to @KMC
    KMC, welcome to CCS and a prev. thread: an earlier attempt at assembling a comprehensive list of Coleman models. Still a good idea and majority of it easily doable (vs more difficult 1890s type or companies/countries that no longer exist type research) and Coleman details are in English ! woohoo
    Above we began a focus re 2 burner suitcases which is what initiated the thread IIRC.

    Do you have a copy of the good book "Coleman Products 1900 - 1983" ?

    all,
    i will paste a list of 1 burners that KMC has presented to CCS, thank you KMC but want to note:
    > with a very quick review, I would consider it a work in progress (re complete and maybe accuracy?)... but good work, to be clear, thank you.
    > KMC is focused on 1 burners... great. We may or may not want to split the stoves into: Wichita, Toronto and Other?
    > re list presented: all the Solus models are absent, the 550A line could be revised?, 520, 521, 522, 525, 527, 457, 458 absent to name a few... i'm sure there are others.
    ColemanKMC1.JPG
    ColemanKMC2.JPG
    thanks again KMC, i gotta run but can follow up.
    @Barrett FYI and
    3,100 views to date
     
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2020
  11. Blueflame

    Blueflame Canada Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2015
    Messages:
    745
    Location:
    Montreal Canada
    This one is missing... IMG_2174__1471625010_75095.jpg IMG_2176__1471625137_51360.jpg
     
  12. Barrett New Zealand

    Offline
    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2018
    Messages:
    397
    Location:
    Northern New Zealand
    Thanks for the tag @OMC , I have seen @KMC list over at CCF and appreciate the ongoing work he is putting into it.
    Fantastic that he has also shared-added it to the valuable reference that CCS is.
    I guess 3,100 views shows this thread has popped up in many a search, so it can only add value.

    Cheers