c.1924 AGM No.9 vs No.3 Q & A

Discussion in 'Stove Forum' started by OMC, Feb 22, 2022.

  1. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,742
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    @Kool Camp Stoves
    elsewhere your: " Hopefully one day we can find out the answers to the questions. If you need pictures or closeups of some internal detail, please ask and I will help in anyway I can. "
    [myself: "I am scratching my head as to what is the difference between the 9 and the 3?"]

    I started this separate thread as your 9 is worthy of it's own consideration (along with how it measures up with the No.3s). This is in stove forum where any/all comments, Q & A is welcome. If/when we might confirm some answers there may be accurate details to compliment your reference post AGM Kampkook #9 :thumbup:

    The No.9 on Marsh site is very different than yours, it is *brass case c.1921 w/peg legs, no hinged cover (*although certainly notable).
    I guess there is no chance no. 9 is an alcohol/marine version? We'll not ignore Marsh example but being sooo different than yours, that 1921 no.9 example is not helping :-k to better define yours.
    Correction btw, yours is c 1924 which emerges below.

    Your 9 is only one of it's kind that I've seen. It is also, for now, the only tag w/latest date of 1923.
    It's a given now your case is not brass. It seems, so far, your 9 matches the 3s so let's take a closer look.

    I dug mine out and have many No.3 details handy. My c.1922/23 No.3 is out and most closely resembles your 9.
    CaptrTag.JPG
    the latest date on my 3: April 4, 1922 and
    the latest date on your 9: Dec. 4, 1923 [the next No.3 tag incl. Dec 9, 1924 ]
    These dates indicate mine is c 1922/23 and yours c 1924
    (because yours is a "9" (not 3) it's possibly later but myself, i do lean towards it being 1924 nonetheless)

    So far, I think yours is a match to mine (we're missing something). Please compare yours w/these details:
    curved legs (permanently attached folding legs)
    cover hinged to case. Cover has wings, wing supports permit adjustment.
    grate hinged to case, grate is 11 1/2 x 7 1/2"
    tank: 10 1/2 x 3" threaded tank -to- separate pump connection
    my pump shaft has looped-end (vs yours has wood knob).
    burner tops 2 1/2" dia., 9 1/8" apart, cntr to cntr.
    CASE, closed, i measure 14 7/16 x 8 1/8 x 3 5/8 (you initially measured 4" height)

    I have looked closely at my burner asm. vs yours, i see no difference.
    I see no difference between the 2 stoves.

    PS thanks for input Haggis
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2022
  2. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,742
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    @Kool Camp Stoves
    So you have compared details i presume.
    We see it turns out your measurements are an exact match to what i shared above
    14 7/16 x 8 1/8 x 3 5/8" source

    So for now you also have no idea why yours got the "No.9" from factory as, so far, from what we see your 9 seems to match No.3s, yes?
    :-k :-k ](*,)
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2022
  3. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,742
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    thank you @Daryl

    just a guy that might help splain this, maybe. Some background:

    my "No.3" pats. ... Reissued April 4, 1922, Canadian Pat No 225354
    threaded pump-to-tank connection
    IMG_0647.JPG

    Kool's "No.9" pats. ... patented Dec 4, 1923, Canadian Pat No 225354
    __________ pump-to-tank connection
    CaptrPmp.JPG

    Daryl's "No.3" pats. ... [same] patented Dec 4, 1923, Canadian Pat No 225354
    looks like same pump as mine (above) w/ change to connection/connector type
    pump.JPG

    tank_opt.jpg

    Have a laugh on me Camp Chef Daryl and if your intent was give me lil nudge in the right direction (or not) thank you. So (i'm a lil slow), hmmm :-k ...
    Kool's "No.9" and Daryl's "No.3" share same patent dates (i missed that, doh! , sorry)
    nameplate23.JPG nameplate23.jpg

    BOTH c 1924 stoves have same "type" pump-to-tank connection, correct?
    (so pump connection is not the difference between "No.3" & "No.9")
    I'm still stumped

    FWIW, AGM did make a change at this time, as both c.1924s pump connections differs from the threaded connection on my c.1922/23 No.3.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2022
  4. Scrambler

    Scrambler Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Australia
    Any chance it's about the accessories/stove kit and not the burner controls etc? This might not be obvious 100 years later. The advertisement recently quoted for an AGM 10 clearly is a package of stove with oven/heater.
     
  5. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,742
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    CORRECTION, sorry the two nameplates are not a match :oops:
    my confuser was acting up late last night. Nonetheless, above we have 1 ver. just prior to the 9 and Daryl's just after the 9, so the gist of the comments remain.
    ===========================

    @Daryl , all,
    @Scrambler ,
    re "The advertisement recently quoted for an AGM 10 clearly is a package of stove with oven/heater."

    I missed that, can you point me to it?

    re call it A. " about the accessories/stove kit ... a package of stove with oven/heater " I did consider/look into that but had not got beyond pure speculation, myself... 'til now.

    I do expect a confirmed answer will emerge.
    Trevor RIP had access to early (non-coleman) US suitcase ads & catalogs may have solved this at jump.

    "A." that gets my vote.
    I await checking that AGM oven info but they did have such add-ons.

    In support of "A." [accessory add-on] note the holes atop the wings in BOTH stoves linked above (3 & 9, two of same vintage). Those upper holes are not present on prev. versions.

    Look what is on the front of a 1928 AGM catalog:
    1928catCvrCut.jpg
    that could be a No.9, front open type, an illustration that might illustrate more pieces to this puzzle. That is the only tidbit I currently have. Note the holes atop of their wings support the upper piece.

    A 1924 patent shows some of those pieces and many more for an enclosed AGM oven.

    Myself, i'll hit pause on this search, my hope being this is well on it's way to a more definitive answer. I do expect the accessorized "No.9" will be sufficiently solved. My guess: solved sooner vs later.
    Any/all comments welcome.
    Carry on.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2022
  6. Scrambler

    Scrambler Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Australia
    Sorry, @OMC and all. My memory has played up! I can't now recall what that advertisement was for, but not an AGM.

    There has been previously reported listing of 1924 stoves from AGM and that does not include a No 9, nor does it suggest the packaging I was flirting with. So I return you to the uncertainty.

    KampkooK No.3
     
  7. Scrambler

    Scrambler Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,146
    Location:
    Australia
  8. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,742
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    credit scrambler,
    i share the image on 1928 cover
    1928catCvrCut.jpg
    you share the No.8 which is larger than the no3 & 9
    8bigrthan9.JPG

    as i say, i pause further search myself, this could-well all make sense as shown, i do expect a definitive answer to emerge soon and that it is along the lines of what we see above but in the smaller No.3 size, which would (likely) be the elusive accessorized "No.9".
    Any/all comments welcome.
    Carry on.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2022
  9. Daryl

    Daryl United States SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2019
    Messages:
    1,613
    Location:
    Sunny SoCal Grand Terrace
    @OMC No nudge intended or needed, you have post plenty of information already. I got a laugh reading 'camp chef Daryl" thanks, the happy face picture is for you! Here are some pictures of mine as found two years ago for future reference. Have this No.3 and a No.7 and when I go to use them they always work, thanks AGM. Chilly looking photo is from driveway this AM. Hopefully next week I can do some more camp cooking. Daryl chilly SoCal
    100_4743 (3).JPG 100_4836.JPG 100_4766.JPG 100_4724.JPG 100_4725.JPG 100_4829.JPG 100_4837.JPG 100_4846.JPG 100_0485.JPG
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2022
  10. Kool Camp Stoves United States

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2021
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Central, MN
    My BAD posted this on wrong thread yesterday so will make it right today.
    #9 AGM info. So here are case dimensions
    IMG_1682.JPG IMG_1685.JPG IMG_1684.JPG
    Here are what the hinges look like
    IMG_1681.JPG
    And the burners which measure center to center at 9 1/8"
    IMG_1687.JPG

    Look at the bottom of case
    IMG_1686.JPG
    Thanks to all for their inputs and info. ( ](*,)Some days it feels like this )
     
  11. OMC

    OMC United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,742
    Location:
    ILLINOIS, USA
    that doesn't matter, no worries.
    What do you think?
    A current suggestion developing, and myself content with it for good or for now, is:
    we'll not find any difference between your 9 as posted and a no.3. -and-
    IF we at some point confirm a 9, complete, resembles the 2 images above will come as no surprise.
    That a 9 is likely a 3 with accessory(s) included.
     
  12. bones United States

    Offline
    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    This is an old thread but perhaps later I can post some pictures of the AGM #9 with the brass case that I have that's posted on Marsh's website. The pump that came with the stove I suspect was not an AGM but an aftermarket collapsible variety. I've kept the stove as received.