111 vs. 111B

Discussion in 'Stove Forum' started by the priest, Sep 2, 2008.

  1. kerophile

    kerophile United Kingdom SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,333
    Location:
    Far North of Scotland
    Hi as Keith and Arne recognize, the burner tubes on an Optimus 111B (the petrol version) do not carry fuel and play no direct part in vapourisation. That was the basis of my comment about it being a flame-plate burner masquerading as a tube burner.
    John says that the Op.111 will run happily without its flame ring whereas the Op 111B will not.

    Here is a photo of my Op. 111, running quite happily at full throttle without the benefit of a flame ring:

    1220459761-Op111exflameplate.jpg

    My Op 111B will not run without its flame ring, it quickly goes from 4 tongues to two tongues of flame, then becomes rapidly unstable and goes out!!! I tried removing the flame-ring from the operating stove three times, with the same result.

    I have come to the conclusion that the Op 111B is a total con. It is a flame-plate burner masquerading as a tube burner! It would have been more honest and efficient to have doubled the size of the 8R burner, to increase heat output from about 1.4 Kw, to nearly 3Kw. This burner would probably be more efficient than the current 111B burner, and likely more stable in operation.

    Your controversially,
    Kerophile
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 26, 2015
  2. Bom Bom Bom Bom

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Messages:
    2,945
    And while they were at it they could have made the whole NRV/Pump Assembly more suitable/safe for use with white gas :shock:
     
  3. Ed Winskill

    Ed Winskill United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    14,912
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washinghton, USA
    Interesting about the flame ring especially, on the B. I've never noticed a problem with a missing flame ring on a keroburner.

    If one day I get a 111, it will be a keroburner. There's probably been more cyber-ink spilled about the 111 and its variants on CCS than any other type of stove, but somehow I still haven't been grabbed by the bug....
     
  4. the priest

    Offline
    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    701
    Kerophile,

    So other than the 111B version being a 'fraud',.......are there any drawbacks other than it doesn't burn right unless all of the parts are in place or are you just saying it's not like the others? Is the stove not worth the price of admission? :-k And,...just so I know I'm clear, the flame ring is the small ring below the burner's top plate, correct? (I'm lacking in stove jargon)
     
  5. Ed Winskill

    Ed Winskill United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    14,912
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washinghton, USA
    The flame ring in the thing you drop onto the burner head, that that ring you're talking about holds....
     
  6. fyldefox

    fyldefox R.I.P.

    Offline
    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    3,103
    . . .yes the flame ring is removable, and rests on the gallery ring which is brazed to the vertical tubes.
     
  7. johnsnz

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2006
    Messages:
    526
    Isn't that the truth ;) ;)

    Either 111 or 111B are good stoves....
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 2, 2015
  8. Doc Mark

    Doc Mark SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    19,577
    Location:
    So. California Mountains
    Hey, Guys,

    I agree with both Ed and John. The 111 is super popular, but so is the 111B. Truth be told, I could be perfectly happy with either stove, as both will do whatever needs to be done with such a stove, and do it very well, indeed! Fraud, or not, the 111B is a trusted workhorse of a stove, and super reliable, as is the 111. Ya' pays yer money, and ya' takes yer choices!! Why not buy one of each? That way, you have both bases covered!! I have two original 111's, plus a 111B that I changed into a 111 with a wonderful burner that Ian sent my way. (Thanks, Ian!) But, I have, probably 6-8 111B's, and to a stove, they are outstanding!! Yes, they are quite a bit more picky about jets. But, with a good jet, they will last you for your lifetime, me thinks! I've used them for many, many years, and think very highly of them. That having been said, I'm also in love with the 111's! For what it's worth, that one man's opinion. Take care, and God Bless!

    Every Good Wish,
    Doc
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 2, 2015
  9. Ian

    Ian Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    7,112
    Location:
    West Yorkshire
    I like the 111Bs at least as much, if not more, than the 111s (own fuel priming does it for me :D ) They are both capable stoves and there's nine-tenths of bugger-all differnce in their output although the B will never have such a pronounced flame pattern due to the shape of the underside of the bnr crown and the absence of the two extra tubes.

    111:

    1220554613-111_flamepattern.jpg


    111B:

    1220554636-111B_flamepattern.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 26, 2015
  10. john watson United Kingdom

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2021
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    north shields
    I cant tell the difference!! could that not be dangerous?
     
  11. kerophile

    kerophile United Kingdom SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,333
    Location:
    Far North of Scotland
    Hi @john watson



    Here is an Optimus 111 burner, courtesy of Doc Mark, :

    upload_2021-2-25_15-57-43.jpeg

    Note that there are 4 pipes between the lower part of the burner and the cross piece at the top.

    And here is the matching picture of an Optimus 111b burner:

    upload_2021-2-25_16-1-13.jpeg

    Note there are only 2 pipes between the base of the burner and the top piece.

    So now you can tell the difference between an Op.111 roarer burner and an Op.111b roarer burner.

    Best Regards,
    Kerophile.
     
  12. kerophile

    kerophile United Kingdom SotM Winner Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2004
    Messages:
    14,333
    Location:
    Far North of Scotland
    Hi, This excellent post by @Twodogs illustrates a number of different Op.111 stove types and tries to establish a time-line for their production:

    Putting a date to Optimus 111

    Best Regards,
    Kerophile.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 25, 2021
  13. john watson United Kingdom

    Offline
    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2021
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    north shields
    Excellent!! and thank you
     
  14. Graham Johnson United Kingdom

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2020
    Messages:
    46
    Location:
    Harrogate
    I purchased an old 111 and after lining the spirit cup with ceramic tape, I found it primes ok with paraffin. Admittedly a bit smokey compared to priming with methylated spirit. As a long term nova and 8r user priming with main fuel siuts me ok