Adjustable pot rests

Discussion in 'Fettling Forum' started by Jaime Massang, Jan 4, 2022.

  1. Jaime Massang

    Jaime Massang Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Messages:
    796
    I have a Fire Maple kettle with a recessed heat exchanger that unfortunately also raises the bottom of the kettle about 2 cm. above the burner (when on the pot stands of my Hipolito roarer).
    I suspect it counteracts any efficiency of the heat exchanger.
    I thought I 'd share my method of making adjustable pot rests to bring the burner closer to the recess.

    adjustable pot rest.jpg
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 5, 2022
  2. Tony Press

    Tony Press Netherlands Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2013
    Messages:
    10,803
    Location:
    Stinkpot Bay, Howden, Tasmania, Australia
    Nice work, Jaime.

    Have you timed the boil at top and bottom settings for the pot rests?

    Tony
     
  3. Ed Winskill

    Ed Winskill United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    14,930
    Location:
    Tacoma, Washinghton, USA
    Nice solution.
     
  4. Jaime Massang

    Jaime Massang Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Messages:
    796
    Unfortunately, I wasn't scientific in my thinking, Tony.

    It's only a small Hipolito and I didn't time it before modifying the stands.

    (Should theoretically be slightly quicker.)
     
  5. Jaime Massang

    Jaime Massang Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Messages:
    796
    Tony,

    I know you have a Fire Maple.

    Hipolito No. 0.('half-pinter'?)- flame ring now just below heat exchanger base flange.

    Room temp water. 1300 ml.( just under spout level)-

    6 min. 45 sec. "bubbles on floor, steam wisping from spout"
    7 min. 25 sec. "full steam, violent boil, spilling from spout"

    Jaime.
     
  6. Jaime Massang

    Jaime Massang Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Messages:
    796
    For those who may still be interested I thought I'd show how close the burner is to the bottom of the kettle.
    The trivet is modified to enable 3 pot 'heights' via slots that engage the now lowered pot rests.
    The adjustable/rotatable tab at the front of the trivet engages the top of the door when closed as a safety feature to prevent tipping forward between the rests.

    IMG_2274 (002).jpg IMG_2275 (002).jpg
     
  7. BradB

    BradB United States Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,800
    Location:
    Central North Carolina USA
    Just a question: didn’t some stovies and stove companies show that lowering the distance from pan to burner increase the carbon monoxide level?
     
  8. redspeedster

    redspeedster United Kingdom Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,936
    Location:
    County Durham
    In my experiments, I found that you actually need to raise the pot to prevent flame quench, when it has a heat exchanger. Not lower as you would logically think.
     
  9. Jaime Massang

    Jaime Massang Australia Subscriber

    Offline
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Messages:
    796
    These points may be related. There is still about 2 cm between the pot base and the flame ring.( I haven't read anything about CO or quenching. ) I think the distance between the flame ring and the pot base may change the shape of the air passage, possibly flaring out the flame slightly more than usual. I also have different flame rings. Some throw the flame more vertically, others more sideways. I think that provided there is sufficient air to complete combustion there shouldn't be a problem. I suspect however that if you did have a pot substantially close i.e. effectively resting on the flame ring you might create an incomplete combustion.